↓ Skip to main content

Measures of intergenerational transmission of obesity in Brazil

Overview of attention for article published in Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Measures of intergenerational transmission of obesity in Brazil
Published in
Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, May 2015
DOI 10.1590/1413-81232015205.13382014
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aléssio Tony Cavalcanti de Almeida, José Luis da Silva Netto

Abstract

A growing proportion of overweight individuals in Brazilian population highlights the importance of research in this area. Thus, this paper investigates the obesity problem from the point of view of intergenerational approach using Body Mass Index (BMI) of parents and their children. The information concerning BMI and socioeconomic control variables are obtained from the Household Budget Survey (POF) 2008-2009. The methodology of analysis considers the Markov transition matrix, quantile regressions and logistic regressions taking into account gender and family structure. The results suggest the existence of a strong association of BMI between parents and children, with the fraction of obese children increasing in families with single parents and households where both parents are obese. The analysis of quantile intergenerational elasticity indicates the higher children's age and their more intense BMI index is the intergenerational effect of parental health. Finally, the effect of maternal obesity is greater than the effect of paternal obesity in terms of intergenerational transmission of obesity for the children, regardless of gender.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 3%
Unknown 28 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 21%
Student > Master 5 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 14%
Professor 3 10%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 6 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 4 14%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 7%
Other 6 21%
Unknown 8 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2015.
All research outputs
#22,758,309
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#1,772
of 2,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#239,364
of 278,920 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#31
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,034 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,920 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.