↓ Skip to main content

Desastres relacionados à seca e saúde coletiva – uma revisão da literatura científica

Overview of attention for article published in Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Desastres relacionados à seca e saúde coletiva – uma revisão da literatura científica
Published in
Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, March 2016
DOI 10.1590/1413-81232015213.21392015
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tais Ariza Alpino, Aderita Ricarda Martins de Sena, Carlos Machado de Freitas

Abstract

In Brazil, the history of droughts has been marked by constant social and health tragedies, with estimates of up to 3 million deaths from the early 19th century until the late 20th century. There is a record of nearly 32,000 events related to the above and more than 96 million people were affected between 1991 and 2010. Although droughts have historically brought disasters to Brazil, which was noted in the scientific expeditions of Arthur Neiva and Belisario Penna that documented these droughts, there have not been many studies on them. The objective of this paper is to present a revision of the scientific articles related to droughts and public health. The following databases were used: PubMed, the Preparation and Response to Disasters Portal from BVS and the Capes Periodical Portal. The descriptors drought and health were used to search titles and summaries of articles in English, Portuguese and Spanish. Among the repercussions related to health that were discovered: malnutrition and nutritional deficiencies, mental health problems, issues relating to water and air quality and commitments made concerning access to health services. As there is a trend for more intense droughts and a scarcity of water until 2030, there is an urgent need for more research and studies in these areas.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 3%
Unknown 70 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 25%
Researcher 9 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Lecturer 3 4%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 22 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 10 14%
Environmental Science 8 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 10%
Social Sciences 6 8%
Engineering 4 6%
Other 15 21%
Unknown 22 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2022.
All research outputs
#5,446,210
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#321
of 2,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,749
of 312,595 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#4
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,034 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,595 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.