↓ Skip to main content

A Educação Ambiental como estratégia de mobilização social para o enfrentamento da escassez de água

Overview of attention for article published in Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Educação Ambiental como estratégia de mobilização social para o enfrentamento da escassez de água
Published in
Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, March 2016
DOI 10.1590/1413-81232015213.26852015
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrezza de Souza Piccoli, Débora Cynamon Kligerman, Simone Cynamon Cohen, Rafaela Facchetti Assumpção

Abstract

Article 225 of the Brazilian Constitution establishes that all citizens have the right to an ecologically balanced environment, as a common good that is essential for a healthy life, and that the government and society have the duty to protect and preserve the environment for present and future generations. This article outlines a methodology for promoting social mobilization to address water scarcity developed under the National Environmental Education and Social Mobilization for Sanitation Program (PEAMSS, acronym in Portuguese). The main aim of this article is to show the importance of education as a driving force for empowerment for water resources management. It outlines the main concepts of emancipatory environmental education and then goes on to describe the elaboration of a PEAMMS action plan. It concludes that the universalization of the right to safe and clean drinking water and access to sanitation is only possible through democratic and participatory water resources management. Actions are necessary to evaluate the reach of the PEAMSS and define the way ahead for the program.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 66 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 18%
Student > Bachelor 10 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 10%
Unspecified 3 4%
Other 3 4%
Other 10 15%
Unknown 22 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 10 15%
Social Sciences 9 13%
Engineering 6 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 6%
Unspecified 3 4%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 24 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2020.
All research outputs
#8,262,445
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#686
of 2,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,136
of 312,601 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#7
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,035 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,601 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.