↓ Skip to main content

Dificuldades vividas por pessoas trans no acesso ao Sistema Único de Saúde

Overview of attention for article published in Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
184 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dificuldades vividas por pessoas trans no acesso ao Sistema Único de Saúde
Published in
Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, August 2016
DOI 10.1590/1413-81232015218.14362015
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pablo Cardozo Rocon, Alexsandro Rodrigues, Jésio Zamboni, Mateus Dias Pedrini

Abstract

The objective of this study was to discuss the difficulties of trans people living in the metropolitan region of Greater Vitória, Espírito Santo, Brazil, in accessing the health services of the Unified Health System (Sistema Único de Saúde - SUS). We used a qualitative approach through semi-structured interviews with 15 trans people. The results point to disrespect toward the adopted name, discrimination, and the diagnosis required for the gender reassignment process as major limitations to accessing the healthcare system. The diagnosis helps hide the responsibility of heteronormativity and gender binarism in the social marginalization of trans people. It is concluded that it is necessary to review the issue of diagnosis, given that the existence of a prior pathology is not required to access the SUS. It is important to develop educational programmes and permanent campaigns concerning the right to access the healthcare system free from discrimination and to use the adopted name.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 184 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 54 29%
Student > Master 24 13%
Researcher 7 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 3%
Professor 6 3%
Other 13 7%
Unknown 74 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 32 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 31 17%
Psychology 13 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 4%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Other 19 10%
Unknown 76 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2019.
All research outputs
#7,688,890
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#654
of 2,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,619
of 381,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#11
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,037 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 381,036 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.