↓ Skip to main content

Estudo comparativo da satisfação de usuários e profissionais da saúde com o serviço público odontológico

Overview of attention for article published in Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Estudo comparativo da satisfação de usuários e profissionais da saúde com o serviço público odontológico
Published in
Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, January 2017
DOI 10.1590/1413-81232017221.13522015
Pubmed ID
Authors

Danielle Bordin, Cristina Berger Fadel, Suzely Adas Saliba Moimaz, Cléa Adas Saliba Garbin, Nemre Adas Saliba

Abstract

The objective was to confront the view of users and health professionals about the satisfaction with the public dental service. Interviews were conducted with users, professionals considered directly (ESB) and indirectly (ACS) involved in oral health. Variables were evaluated individually and grouped into domains. A score was created for the analysis and the Kruskal-Wallis test was applied. The respondents positively assessed the quality of the dental services. The ACS demonstrated less satisfaction compared to users regarding general satisfaction in the Physical Structure and Medical Care domains and the variables: quality of clinical care; guidance to the patient after treatment performed in the specialty; and period of dental care. The ESB professionals expressed greater satisfaction than the users in the Medical Care domain and in the variables related to the provision of guidance, answering questions, attention solvability and consultation scheduling. It is concluded that the ESB professionals demonstrated a high degree of similarity to the satisfaction displayed by users, although positively expanded, and the ACS expressed more critically discrepant opinions in relation to users.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 31%
Professor 3 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 10 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 34%
Social Sciences 3 10%
Psychology 2 7%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 10 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2017.
All research outputs
#17,286,645
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#1,121
of 2,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#267,840
of 421,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#14
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,035 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,660 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.