↓ Skip to main content

Insegurança alimentar moderada e grave em famílias integradas por pessoas vivendo com HIV/Aids: validação da escala e fatores associados

Overview of attention for article published in Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Insegurança alimentar moderada e grave em famílias integradas por pessoas vivendo com HIV/Aids: validação da escala e fatores associados
Published in
Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, October 2017
DOI 10.1590/1413-812320172210.02462017
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amira Rose Costa Medeiros, Rafaela Lira Formiga Cavalcanti de Lima, Leidyanny Barbosa de Medeiros, Flávia Maiele Pedroza Trajano, Amanda Amaiy Pessoa Salerno, Ronei Marcos de Moraes, Rodrigo Pinheiro de Toledo Vianna

Abstract

Vulnerable population groups, including people living with HIV/Aids (PLHA), may have a high prevalence of food insecurity (FI). A cross-sectional study evaluated the internal validity of the Brazilian Food Insecurity Scale (Escala Brasileira de Insegurança Alimentar - EBIA) and measured the prevalence of FI in a sample of 796 PLHA in João Pessoa, Paraíba State (PB). The validation was performed using a Rasch analysis. The association of FI with sociodemographic and clinical characteristics was assessed using the chi-square test. Associated variables were included in a Poisson multiple regression model. The EBIA was valid for PLHA with fit values within the expected limits and item severity conforming to the theoretical model. The EBIA identified 66.5% of PLHA with FI in the sample (30.8% mild FI, 18.1% moderate FI and 17.6% severe FI). Moderate FI and severe FI were associated with an age younger than 43 years (prevalence ratio (PR) = 1.49; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.14-1.86), primary education (PR=1.64; 95% CI: 1.24-2.17), income per capita lower than ½ minimum wage (MW) (PR=1.83; 95% CI: 1.37-2.44), lack of occupation (PR=1.59; 95% CI: 1.16-2.19) and adult-only households with a female reference person (PR=2.19; 95% CI: 1.45-3.31). The PLHA in this study had a high prevalence of FI, worsening their living conditions and potentially exacerbating their health problems.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 28%
Student > Bachelor 6 24%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 4%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 20%
Social Sciences 2 8%
Philosophy 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 10 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2017.
All research outputs
#16,051,091
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#987
of 2,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#188,166
of 331,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#18
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,037 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,218 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.