You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Percepção da perda auditiva: utilização da escala subjetiva de faces para triagem auditiva em idosos
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, November 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1590/1413-812320172211.277872016 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Letícia Pimenta Costa-Guarisco, Daniela Dalpubel, Ludimila Labanca, Marcos Hortes Nisihara Chagas |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 46 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 28% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 7% |
| Professor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 17 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 11% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 9% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 4% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 22 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2024.
All research outputs
#5,449,088
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#323
of 2,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,396
of 340,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#4
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,037 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,752 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.