You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Reforma dos Cuidados de Saúde Primários em Portugal: portuguesa, moderna e inovadora
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, March 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1590/1413-81232017223.33152016 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
André Rosa Biscaia, Liliana Correia Valente Heleno |
| Abstract |
The 2005 Portuguese primary health care (CSP) reform was one of the most successful reforms of the country's public services. The most relevant event was the establishment of Family Health Units (USF): voluntary and self-organized multidisciplinary teams that provide customized medical and nursing care to a group of people. Then, the remaining realms of CSP were reorganized with the establishment of Health Center Clusters (ACeS). Clinical governance was implemented aiming at achieving health gains by improving quality and participation and accountability of all. This paper aims to characterize the 2005 reform of Portuguese CSP with an analysis of its systemic and local realms. This is a case study of a CSP reform of a health system with documentary analysis and description of one of its facilities. This reform was Portuguese, modern and innovative. Portuguese by not breaking completely with the past, modern because it has adhered to technology and networking, and innovative because it broke with the traditional hierarchized model. It fulfilled the goal of a reform: it achieved improvements with greater satisfaction of all and health gains. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 242 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 242 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 50 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 23 | 10% |
| Unknown | 107 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 52 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 16 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 4% |
| Psychology | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 24 | 10% |
| Unknown | 115 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2020.
All research outputs
#7,049,212
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#609
of 2,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,920
of 324,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#3
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,035 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,443 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.