You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Dificuldade de acesso a serviços de média complexidade em municípios de pequeno porte: um estudo de caso
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, April 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1590/1413-81232017224.27002016 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Camila Ribeiro Silva, Brigida Gimenez Carvalho, Luiz Cordoni, Elisabete de Fátima Pólo de Almeida Nunes |
| Abstract |
The study aimed to describe the specialized health services and to identify areas of greater difficulty of access to specialized consultations offered by SUS in small cities in the 18th Regional Health Area of Paraná State, Brazil, using case study methodology. The data were collected between January and April 2015. Managers, management teams and the board of directors of the CIS (Consórcio Intermunicipal de Saúde) were interviewed. The 21 studied specialist areas were rated like Sufficient Quota, Insufficient Quota, Inexistent Supply, and Assistance Gap. The services with more difficulty of access were Vascular Surgery, Proctology, Geriatrics, Endocrinology, and Neurology, considered Inexistent Supply/Assistance Gap, and Orthopedics, Neuro-pediatrics, Urology, Rheumatology, Ophthalmology, and Otorhinolaryngology, were considered Insufficient Share. Contribute to the magnitude of the problem: lack of specialist doctors, private sector dependence and de decrease of the Federal and State Governments in financing the Health Sistem. Therefore, the gap in specialized healthcare is complex and difficult to solve in the short-terms, proving that this services have become a "bottleneck" in the SUS. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 60 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 8% |
| Researcher | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 15% |
| Unknown | 21 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 7% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 15% |
| Unknown | 22 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2023.
All research outputs
#16,725,651
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#1,057
of 2,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#196,796
of 323,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#19
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,035 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,961 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.