↓ Skip to main content

Fatores associados a violências contra crianças em Serviços Sentinela de Urgência nas capitais brasileiras

Overview of attention for article published in Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fatores associados a violências contra crianças em Serviços Sentinela de Urgência nas capitais brasileiras
Published in
Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, September 2017
DOI 10.1590/1413-81232017229.12752017
Pubmed ID
Authors

Deborah Carvalho Malta, Regina Tomie Ivata Bernal, Barbara de Sá Menezes Teixeira, Marta Maria Alves da Silva, Maria Imaculada de Fátima Freitas

Abstract

This study explored the association between demographic characteristics (age and sex) and other variables related to violence committed against children (form of violence perpetrator, place of occurrence, and nature of injury) using a sample of 404 children taken from the 2014 Violence and Accident Surveillance System (Sistema de Vigilância de Violências e Acidentes, VIVA) survey. Correspondence analysis was used to identify variables associated with the outcome violence against children. Victims were predominantly male. The most common form of violence was neglect/abandonment, followed by physical violence and sexual violence. The most common perpetrators were parents (ages zero to one and two to five years), followed by friends (ages six to nine years). The most common place of occurrence was the home. Notable levels of violence were observed at school, particularly among children aged between six and nine years. Neglect was most common in the age group zero to one year and two to five years, while physical violence was most common between children aged between six and nine years.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 21%
Student > Master 7 18%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Researcher 3 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 10 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 15%
Psychology 5 13%
Unspecified 2 5%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 11 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2017.
All research outputs
#19,951,180
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#1,461
of 2,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#236,644
of 324,453 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#26
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,035 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,453 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.