↓ Skip to main content

Pacto pela saúde: aproximações e colisões na arena federativa

Overview of attention for article published in Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pacto pela saúde: aproximações e colisões na arena federativa
Published in
Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, January 2018
DOI 10.1590/1413-81232018231.17902015
Pubmed ID
Authors

Telma Maria Gonçalves Menicucci, Luciana Assis Costa, José Ângelo Machado

Abstract

This article analyze the institutional construction process of the Health Pact, consolidated in 2006 and that expresses an incremental evolution of the regulatory framework of federative relationships in Brazilian National Health System. Even considering that such process has developed in a federative parity arena ( CIT) it is assumed the general hypothesis of Brazilian literature about federalism that suggests the Federal Government dominant role in the formulation of social policies. Using an institutionalist approach, focusing on the relationship between Federalism and Public Policy it was done a qualitative study starting from semi-structured interviews with managers and consultants who participated in the process and analyzing the minutes of meetings from CIT between 2004-2012. The results indicate: the federal government held the formulation initiative, but there was reasonable influence of sub national governments; the long discussions period reflected a high degree of dissent between the federated entities; as a result, the question of financing was transferred to a political commitment for expansion of funding sources to be assumed by the three spheres of government; the Health Pact did not change the dynamics federative relations regarding the frame of regional health care networks.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 50 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 28%
Student > Bachelor 8 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 6%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 12 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 10 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 18%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 4%
Arts and Humanities 2 4%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 13 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2018.
All research outputs
#6,600,606
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#355
of 2,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,202
of 449,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#3
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,037 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,550 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.