↓ Skip to main content

Notificação da violência infantil, fluxos de atenção e processo de trabalho dos profissionais da Atenção Primária em Saúde

Overview of attention for article published in Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Notificação da violência infantil, fluxos de atenção e processo de trabalho dos profissionais da Atenção Primária em Saúde
Published in
Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, January 2018
DOI 10.1590/1413-81232018231.22062017
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emiko Yoshikawa Egry, Maíra Rosa Apostolico, Teresa Christine Pereira Morais

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze the flows of the network of children's protection against violence regarding reporting and decisions made. This is a qualitative research based on the Theory of Praxis Interpretation of Community Health Nursing - TIPESC, proposed by Egry, which seeks nursing intervention through a dynamic and participative methodology. Data were collected through official documents and interviews with Primary Health Care professionals in three health facilities of a Brazilian city and analyzed through Dialectical Hermeneutics and the Flowchart Analyzing the Care Model of a Health Service. Results point to the difficulties and weaknesses of the care network in addressing issues, the need for intersectoral actions and the training of professionals to deal with situations of violence. In conclusion, strategies must be adopted to increase the capacity of monitoring and follow-up of reported cases, to provide qualified training of workers and organize the health network, with a view to offering a sufficient number of quality care services and to receive contributions from professionals to address violence against children.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 79 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 21 27%
Student > Master 13 16%
Student > Postgraduate 5 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Professor 4 5%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 28 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 21 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 15%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Engineering 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 33 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2018.
All research outputs
#6,600,606
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#355
of 2,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,202
of 449,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#3
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,037 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,550 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.