↓ Skip to main content

Uso de rastreadores para busca de reações adversas a medicamentos como motivo de admissão de idosos em pronto-socorro

Overview of attention for article published in Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Uso de rastreadores para busca de reações adversas a medicamentos como motivo de admissão de idosos em pronto-socorro
Published in
Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, November 2018
DOI 10.1590/1413-812320182311.27022016
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kelly Lie Nagai, Patricia Sayuri Katayose Takahashi, Lucia Mendes de Oliveira Pinto, Nicolina Silvana Romano-Lieber

Abstract

Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) can cause illness, disability or death, especially in the elderly. An active search for suspected ADRs was carried out using triggers, which motivated the search of elderly people under care in adult emergency departments (ED). It was a cross-sectional and retrospective study that used an adaptation of the Institute of Health Care Improvement triggers. A total of 287 medical records were analyzed and 38 triggers were found, identifying 7 suspected ADRs. One was found without the use of triggers. Thus, in total, 8 ADRs (2.79%) were found, of which 6 were considered serious. There was a higher prevalence of ADRs in females (62.5%) and in those over 80 years of age (50%). The medications most implicated were those for alimentary tract and metabolism and cardiovascular system. Of the triggers tested, some are essential for use at EDs, such as those that indicate problems with anticoagulants, hypoglycemic agents and antihypertensives. Triggers have proved useful for an active search for suspected ADRs at EDs, including severe ones, identifying problems occurring outside hospital settings and signaling medications that pose an increased risk to the elderly .

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 21%
Student > Master 4 14%
Other 2 7%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 11 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Unspecified 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 10 36%