↓ Skip to main content

Trajetórias Terapêuticas Familiares: doenças raras hereditárias como sofrimento de longa duração

Overview of attention for article published in Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Trajetórias Terapêuticas Familiares: doenças raras hereditárias como sofrimento de longa duração
Published in
Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, February 2018
DOI 10.1590/1413-81232018232.21832017
Pubmed ID
Authors

Waleska de Araújo Aureliano

Abstract

This article analyzes common elements in the trajectory of people affected by rare hereditary diseases in Brazil, focusing on the search for diagnosis and treatment, and the reproducibility in the family. Rare diseases affect 65 people in every 100 thousand. These are usually chronic and degenerative conditions, many incurable or without effective treatment. About 80% of rare diseases are genetic in origin and can be inherited. This fact has important implications for family health care policies, reproduction, and care for clinical conditions that, in some cases, spanned generations. To analyze the data, two theoretical axes are articulated: family and kinship studies, and analyzes of long-term suffering. The research investigated people affected by rare hereditary diseases and their families, in the political scenarios in which these actors circulate, such as patient associations, scientific congresses and public hearings. There is evidence of the need to build a continuous agenda on rare diseases in Brazil capable of effectively promoting universal and integral access of the affected persons to the public health system, and seeking for solutions to alleviate suffering that threatens the very continuity of the family.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 79 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 19%
Student > Master 9 11%
Student > Postgraduate 4 5%
Professor 4 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 36 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 10 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 9%
Psychology 4 5%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 36 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2018.
All research outputs
#6,600,606
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#355
of 2,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,245
of 448,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#3
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,037 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,849 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.