You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
O SUS e a Política Nacional de Promoção da Saúde: perspectiva resultados, avanços e desafios em tempos de crise
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, June 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1590/1413-81232018236.04782018 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Deborah Carvalho Malta, Ademar Arthur Chioro dos Reis, Patrícia Constante Jaime, Otaliba Libanio de Morais, Marta Maria Alves da Silva, Marco Akerman |
| Abstract |
This article examines progress made towards the implementation of the core priorities laid out in the National Health Promotion Policy (PNPS, acronym in Portuguese) and current challenges, highlighting aspects that are essential to ensuring the sustainability of this policy in times of crisis. It consists of a narrative review drawing on published research and official government documents. The PNPS was approved in 2006 and revised in 2014 and emphasizes the importance of social determinants of health and the adoption of an intersectoral approach to health promotion based on shared responsibility networks aimed at improving quality of life. Progress has been made across all core priorities: tackling the use of tobacco and its derivatives; tackling alcohol and other drug abuse; promoting safe and sustainable mobility; adequate and healthy food; physical activity; promoting a culture of peace and human rights; and promoting sustainable development. However, this progress is seriously threatened by the grave political, economic and institutional crisis that plagues the country, notably budget cuts and a spending cap that limits public spending for the next 20 years imposed by Constitutional Amendment Nº 95, painting a future full of uncertainties. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 146 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 12% |
| Professor | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 12% |
| Unknown | 62 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 12% |
| Psychology | 7 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Sports and Recreations | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 21 | 14% |
| Unknown | 68 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2019.
All research outputs
#2,634,108
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#86
of 2,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,998
of 342,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#11
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,037 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,877 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.