↓ Skip to main content

SUS: oferta, acesso e utilização de serviços de saúde nos últimos 30 anos

Overview of attention for article published in Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#21 of 2,040)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
157 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
228 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
SUS: oferta, acesso e utilização de serviços de saúde nos últimos 30 anos
Published in
Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, June 2018
DOI 10.1590/1413-81232018236.06022018
Pubmed ID
Authors

Francisco Viacava, Ricardo Antunes Dantas de Oliveira, Carolina de Campos Carvalho, Josué Laguardia, Jaime Gregório Bellido

Abstract

Significant changes have been witnessed in the Brazilian health system over the last 30 years. This article outlines trends in outpatient and hospital care, staffing, and health service use during this period. There was a significant expansion of the public health network, particularly of primary care services, leading to improved access to consultations and a reduction in hospital admissions. However, there is a persistent shortage of health professionals in Brazil's public health system, particularly dentists. Despite improvements in coverage, the public system continues to face serious challenges, particularly with respect to funding, service provision, and its relationship with the private sector.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 228 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 228 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 42 18%
Student > Bachelor 35 15%
Student > Postgraduate 14 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 5%
Professor 11 5%
Other 24 11%
Unknown 90 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 36 16%
Psychology 9 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 8 4%
Social Sciences 8 4%
Other 29 13%
Unknown 101 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,499,364
of 25,399,318 outputs
Outputs from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#21
of 2,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,656
of 342,904 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#2
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,399,318 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,040 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,904 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.