↓ Skip to main content

Unusual association of NDM-1 with KPC-2 and armA among Brazilian Enterobacteriaceae isolates

Overview of attention for article published in Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Unusual association of NDM-1 with KPC-2 and armA among Brazilian Enterobacteriaceae isolates
Published in
Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, February 2015
DOI 10.1590/1414-431x20144154
Pubmed ID
Authors

M.G. Quiles, T.T. Rocchetti, L.C. Fehlberg, E.J.U. Kusano, A. Chebabo, R.M.G. Pereira, A.C. Gales, A.C.C. Pignatari

Abstract

We report the microbiological characterization of four New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase-1 (blaNDM-1)-producing Enterobacteriaceae isolated in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. blaNDM-1 was located on a conjugative plasmid and was associated with Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-2 (blaKPC-2) or aminoglycoside-resistance methylase (armA), a 16S rRNA methylase not previously reported in Brazil, in two distinct strains of Enterobacter cloacae. Our results suggested that the introduction of blaNDM-1 in Brazil has been accompanied by rapid spread, since our isolates showed no genetic relationship.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 83 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 22%
Student > Bachelor 10 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 9%
Researcher 8 9%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 16 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 21%
Immunology and Microbiology 17 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 6%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 20 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2015.
All research outputs
#20,653,708
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research
#901
of 1,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#269,077
of 361,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research
#7
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,254 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,157 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.