You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effects of a physical fitness program on memory and blood viscosity in sedentary elderly men
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, September 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1590/1414-431x20154529 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
H.K. Antunes, M.T. De Mello, R.F. Santos-Galduróz, J.C.F. Galduróz, V.Aquino Lemos, S. Tufik, O.F.A. Bueno |
| Abstract |
The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of a 6-month exercise program on cognitive function and blood viscosity in sedentary elderly men. Forty-six healthy inactive men, aged 60-75 years were randomly distributed into a control group (n=23) and an experimental group (n=23). Participants underwent blood analysis and physical and memory evaluation, before and after the 6-month program of physical exercise. The control group was instructed not to alter its everyday activities; the experimental group took part in the fitness program. The program was conducted using a cycle ergometer, 3 times per week on alternate days, with intensity and volume individualized at ventilatory threshold 1. Sessions were continuous and maximum duration was 60 min each. There was significant improvement in memory (21%; P<0.05), decreased blood viscosity (-19%; P<0.05), and higher aerobic capacity (48%; P<0.05) among participants in the experimental group compared with the control group. These data suggest that taking part in an aerobic physical fitness program at an intensity corresponding to ventilatory threshold-1 may be considered a nonmedication alternative to improve physical and cognitive function. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 101 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 10% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 15 | 15% |
| Unknown | 31 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 20 | 19% |
| Psychology | 13 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 10% |
| Unknown | 36 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2021.
All research outputs
#2,759,749
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research
#57
of 1,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,144
of 276,788 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research
#2
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,254 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,788 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.