↓ Skip to main content

A errância: para além de um sintoma patológico

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Latinoamericana de Psicopatologia Fundamental, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#28 of 156)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A errância: para além de um sintoma patológico
Published in
Revista Latinoamericana de Psicopatologia Fundamental, September 2016
DOI 10.1590/1415-4714.2016v19n3p452.6
Authors

Ana Claudia Soares, Angélica Bastos

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2022.
All research outputs
#14,787,133
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Revista Latinoamericana de Psicopatologia Fundamental
#28
of 156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#187,606
of 348,375 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Latinoamericana de Psicopatologia Fundamental
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 156 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,375 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them