Title |
Evidence on acne therapy
|
---|---|
Published in |
Sao Paulo Medical Journal, June 2013
|
DOI | 10.1590/1516-3180.2013.1313616 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Caroline Sousa Costa, Ediléia Bagatin |
Abstract |
Among the current treatments available for acne vulgaris, many widely practiced options lack support from studies at the best level of scientific evidence. The aim of this narrative review was to present the very latest information on topical and systemic treatments for acne vulgaris. Information from systematic reviews and well-designed clinical trials, obtained through a systematic search of the major medical databases, is emphasized. There are important issues regarding the clinical management of acne that still lack consistent grounding in scientific evidence. Among these are the optimum dose and duration of treatment with oral antibiotics that can be given without inducing bacterial resistance, and the safety of oral isotretinoin. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 1 | 50% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 51 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 13 | 25% |
Student > Master | 6 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 12% |
Other | 4 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 8% |
Other | 7 | 14% |
Unknown | 11 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 37% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 8% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 8% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 6% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
Other | 7 | 14% |
Unknown | 12 | 24% |