↓ Skip to main content

Translation and cultural adaptation of the stroke impact scale 2.0 (SIS): a quality-of-life scale for stroke

Overview of attention for article published in Sao Paulo Medical Journal, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Translation and cultural adaptation of the stroke impact scale 2.0 (SIS): a quality-of-life scale for stroke
Published in
Sao Paulo Medical Journal, March 2018
DOI 10.1590/1516-3180.2017.0114281017
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aline Dias Brandão, Natasha Bertocco Teixeira, Maria Claudia Brandão, Milena Carlos Vidotto, José Roberto Jardim, Mariana Rodrigues Gazzotti

Abstract

No specific quality-of-life scale for stroke patients has previously been translated and evaluated for reproducibility, for use in the Portuguese language. Internationally, the instrument for this purpose is the Stroke Impact Scale 2.0 (SIS). Use of of SIS enables comprehensive analysis on the impact of mild and moderate stroke on patients' lives. The aims here were to translate SIS into Portuguese, adapt it culturally, evaluate its reproducibility and correlate it with SF-36 among stroke patients. Translation and validation study. The process of initial and retrograde translation was performed, in addition to cultural adaptation to the Brazilian language and culture. SIS was applied to 40 patients, who answered the questions three times. On the first day, the scale was applied twice by two independent researchers (to evaluate interobserver reproducibility). Fifteen days later, the scale was applied for a third time by another researcher (intraobserver reproducibility). The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to measure the reproducibility of the SIS scale. The reproducibility of the whole scale was very good (ICC: 0.73 to 0.99). Intraobserver reproducibility in all domains was also very good (ICC: 0.85 to 0.95). Comparison of SIS with SF-36 showed that the domains of strength, mobility and activities of daily living (ADLs) correlated moderately with the functional capacity domain, as did the ADL domain with general health status. The other correlations were weak. The depression domain showed a moderate negative correlation with the memory and communication domains. The translation of the SIS 2.0 scale was easy to understand and it had good reproducibility among stroke patients.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 16%
Student > Master 8 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Student > Postgraduate 4 7%
Researcher 3 5%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 16 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 10 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 18%
Psychology 3 5%
Linguistics 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Other 10 18%
Unknown 18 33%