↓ Skip to main content

Determinants of adherence to treatment in first-episode psychosis: a comprehensive review

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
179 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Determinants of adherence to treatment in first-episode psychosis: a comprehensive review
Published in
Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria, May 2015
DOI 10.1590/1516-4446-2014-1539
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emilie Leclerc, Cristiano Noto, Rodrigo A. Bressan, Elisa Brietzke

Abstract

To conduct a comprehensive review of current evidence on factors for nonadherence to treatment in individuals with first-episode psychosis (FEP). MEDLINE, LILACS, PsycINFO, and SciELO databases were searched with the keywords first episode psychosis, factor, adherence, nonadherence, engagement, disengagement, compliance, and intervention. References of selected studies were consulted for relevant articles. A total of 157 articles were screened, of which 33 articles were retained for full review. The factors related to nonadherence were: a) patient-related (e.g., lower education level, persistent substance use, forensic history, unemployment, history of physical abuse); b) environment-related (e.g., no family involved in treatment, social adjustment difficulties); c) medication-related (e.g., rapid remission of negative symptoms when starting treatment, therapeutic alliance); and d) illness-related (e.g., more positive symptoms, more relapses). Treatment factors that improve adherence include a good therapeutic alliance and a voluntary first admission when hospitalization occurs. The results of this review suggest that nonadherence to treatment in FEP is multifactorial. Many of these factors are modifiable and can be specifically targeted in early intervention programs. Very few studies have assessed strategies to raise adherence in FEP.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 179 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 176 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 16%
Researcher 22 12%
Student > Bachelor 17 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 9%
Student > Postgraduate 15 8%
Other 30 17%
Unknown 51 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 21%
Psychology 36 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 11%
Social Sciences 11 6%
Neuroscience 6 3%
Other 10 6%
Unknown 58 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2015.
All research outputs
#20,656,820
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria
#707
of 902 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#206,512
of 278,918 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria
#10
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 902 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,918 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.