↓ Skip to main content

Is semantic verbal fluency impairment explained by executive function deficits in schizophrenia?

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Is semantic verbal fluency impairment explained by executive function deficits in schizophrenia?
Published in
Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria, April 2016
DOI 10.1590/1516-4446-2015-1663
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arthur A. Berberian, Giovanna V. Moraes, Ary Gadelha, Elisa Brietzke, Ana O. Fonseca, Bruno S. Scarpato, Marcella O. Vicente, Alessandra G. Seabra, Rodrigo A. Bressan, Acioly L. Lacerda

Abstract

To investigate if verbal fluency impairment in schizophrenia reflects executive function deficits or results from degraded semantic store or inefficient search and retrieval strategies. Two groups were compared: 141 individuals with schizophrenia and 119 healthy age and education-matched controls. Both groups performed semantic and phonetic verbal fluency tasks. Performance was evaluated using three scores, based on 1) number of words generated; 2) number of clustered/related words; and 3) switching score. A fourth performance score based on the number of clusters was also measured. SZ individuals produced fewer words than controls. After controlling for the total number of words produced, a difference was observed between the groups in the number of cluster-related words generated in the semantic task. In both groups, the number of words generated in the semantic task was higher than that generated in the phonemic task, although a significant group vs. fluency type interaction showed that subjects with schizophrenia had disproportionate semantic fluency impairment. Working memory was positively associated with increased production of words within clusters and inversely correlated with switching. Semantic fluency impairment may be attributed to an inability (resulting from reduced cognitive control) to distinguish target signal from competing noise and to maintain cues for production of memory probes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Unknown 94 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 16%
Student > Master 16 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 14%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Student > Postgraduate 6 6%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 24 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 28 29%
Neuroscience 13 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 10%
Linguistics 7 7%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 28 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2016.
All research outputs
#20,674,485
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria
#708
of 903 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#233,432
of 313,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 903 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,515 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.