↓ Skip to main content

Opioid peptides and gastrointestinal symptoms in autism spectrum disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
165 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Opioid peptides and gastrointestinal symptoms in autism spectrum disorders
Published in
Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria, June 2016
DOI 10.1590/1516-4446-2015-1777
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cristiane P. Lázaro, Milena P. Pondé, Luiz E.A. Rodrigues

Abstract

Autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) are characterized by deficits in the individual's ability to socialize, communicate, and use the imagination, in addition to stereotyped behaviors. These disorders have a heterogenous phenotype, both in relation to symptoms and regarding severity. Organic problems related to the gastrointestinal tract are often associated with ASD, including dysbiosis, inflammatory bowel disease, exocrine pancreatic insufficiency, celiac disease, indigestion, malabsorption, food intolerance, and food allergies, leading to vitamin deficiencies and malnutrition. In an attempt to explain the pathophysiology involved in autism, a theory founded on opioid excess has been the focus of various investigations, since it partially explains the symptomatology of the disorder. Another hypothesis has been put forward whereby the probable triggers of ASDs would be related to the presence of bacteria in the bowel, oxidative stress, and intestinal permeability. The present update reviews these hypotheses.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 165 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 165 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 30 18%
Student > Master 22 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 10%
Researcher 15 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Other 26 16%
Unknown 45 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 10%
Psychology 13 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 7%
Other 24 15%
Unknown 53 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2021.
All research outputs
#5,482,889
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria
#183
of 906 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,192
of 369,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 906 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,298 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.