↓ Skip to main content

The role of the CNR1 gene in schizophrenia: a systematic review including unpublished data

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The role of the CNR1 gene in schizophrenia: a systematic review including unpublished data
Published in
Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria, January 2017
DOI 10.1590/1516-4446-2016-1969
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eduardo S. Gouvêa, Airton F. Santos, Vanessa K. Ota, Vinicius Mrad, Ary Gadelha, Rodrigo A. Bressan, Quirino Cordeiro, Sintia I. Belangero

Abstract

Schizophrenia is a multifactorial disorder. It is known that a combination of extensive multiple common alleles may be involved in its etiology, each contributing with a small to moderate effect, and, possibly, some rare alleles with a much larger effect size. We aimed to perform a systematic review of association studies between schizophrenia (and its subphenotypes) and polymorphisms in the CNR1 gene, which encodes cannabinoid receptors classically implicated in schizophrenia pathophysiology, as well as to present unpublished results of an association study in a Brazilian population. Two reviewers independently searched for eligible studies and extracted outcome data using a structured form. Papers were retrieved from PubMed and ISI Web of Knowledge using the search term schizophrenia in combination with CNR1 or CB1 or cannabinoid receptor. Twenty-four articles met our inclusion criteria. We additionally present data from a study of our own comparing 182 patients with schizophrenia and 244 healthy controls. No consistent evidence is demonstrated. Some seemingly positive association studies stress the need for further investigations of the possible role of endocannabinoid genetics in schizophrenia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 95 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 17%
Student > Bachelor 11 12%
Researcher 8 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Other 16 17%
Unknown 29 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 22%
Neuroscience 8 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 7%
Psychology 3 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Other 16 17%
Unknown 37 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2017.
All research outputs
#14,256,180
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria
#394
of 902 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,693
of 423,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria
#6
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 902 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,566 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.