Title |
Psychiatric evaluation of civil capacity with the new Brazilian Statute of the Person with Disabilities
|
---|---|
Published in |
Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria, May 2017
|
DOI | 10.1590/1516-4446-2016-2046 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Elias Abdalla-Filho |
Abstract |
The objective of this paper is to provide an update to psychiatrists regarding the new Brazilian Law for the Inclusion of People with Disabilities (BLI, Law 13,146 of 2015), and, specifically, to discuss potential implications of situations in which examination by a forensic psychiatrist points toward civil incompetence, while the above-mentioned law mandates full civil capacity for disabled persons. A study of Law 13,146/2015 was conducted, including a comparative analysis of legal and psychiatric approaches on the subject. This analysis revealed that the BLI has generated differences of opinion among legislators. However, the greatest difference seems to arise between the justice system and psychiatric expertise in relation to the difference of criteria adopted in the two approaches. The BLI is very recent; it should be revised in response to debates among psychiatrists and the criminal justice system, and especially as jurisprudence is formed over time. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
India | 1 | 17% |
New Zealand | 1 | 17% |
Australia | 1 | 17% |
Mexico | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 21 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 5 | 24% |
Other | 2 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 5% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 9 | 43% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 24% |
Psychology | 4 | 19% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 5% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 9 | 43% |