↓ Skip to main content

Estado falido, leitura falida. Aparelhos privados e públicos de hegemonia na narrativa brasileira e cubana da década de 1990

Overview of attention for article published in Alea : Estudos Neolatinos, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#43 of 135)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Estado falido, leitura falida. Aparelhos privados e públicos de hegemonia na narrativa brasileira e cubana da década de 1990
Published in
Alea : Estudos Neolatinos, August 2020
DOI 10.1590/1517-106x/2020222137151
Authors

Dionisio Márquez Arreaza

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Linguistics 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2020.
All research outputs
#17,297,846
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Alea : Estudos Neolatinos
#43
of 135 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#273,516
of 426,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Alea : Estudos Neolatinos
#6
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 135 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.6. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,823 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.