You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Escritas em movimento: a imaginação translinguística na obra de Junot Díaz
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Alea : Estudos Neolatinos, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1590/1517-106x/211249268 |
| Authors |
Lívia Santos de Souza |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2019.
All research outputs
#15,376,894
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from Alea : Estudos Neolatinos
#25
of 133 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,094
of 365,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Alea : Estudos Neolatinos
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 133 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,721 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.