↓ Skip to main content

Nursing interventions for rehabilitation in Parkinson's disease: cross mapping of terms

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nursing interventions for rehabilitation in Parkinson's disease: cross mapping of terms
Published in
Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, August 2016
DOI 10.1590/1518-8345.0689.2728
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michelle Hyczy de Siqueira Tosin, Débora Moraes Campos, Leonardo Tadeu de Andrade, Beatriz Guitton Renaud Baptista de Oliveira, Rosimere Ferreira Santana

Abstract

to perform a cross-term mapping of nursing language in the patient record with the Nursing Interventions Classification system, in rehabilitation patients with Parkinson's disease. a documentary research study to perform cross mapping. A probabilistic, simple random sample composed of 67 records of patients with Parkinson's disease who participated in a rehabilitation program, between March of 2009 and April of 2013. The research was conducted in three stages, in which the nursing terms were mapped to natural language and crossed with the Nursing Interventions Classification. a total of 1,077 standard interventions that, after crossing with the taxonomy and refinement performed by the experts, resulted in 32 interventions equivalent to the Nursing Interventions Classification (NIC) system. The NICs, "Education: The process of the disease.", "Contract with the patient", and "Facilitation of Learning" were present in 100% of the records. For these interventions, 40 activities were described, representing 13 activities by intervention. the cross mapping allowed for the identification of corresponding terms with the nursing interventions used every day in rehabilitation nursing, and compared them to the Nursing Interventions Classification.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 59 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 25%
Student > Master 7 12%
Other 5 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 7%
Researcher 3 5%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 17 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 27 46%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 10%
Neuroscience 3 5%
Unspecified 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 16 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2017.
All research outputs
#7,355,485
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem
#128
of 842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,351
of 378,544 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem
#9
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 842 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 378,544 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.