↓ Skip to main content

Systematic Review of the profile of emergency contraception users

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Systematic Review of the profile of emergency contraception users
Published in
Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, July 2016
DOI 10.1590/1518-8345.0882.2733
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria de Lluc Bauzà Amengual, Magdalena Esteva Canto, Inmaculada Pereiro Berenguer, Maria Ingla Pol

Abstract

Abastract Objective: to discern the profile of the Spanish Emergency Contraceptive users (EC). systematic review of contraceptive use in the Spanish population. Spanish and international databases, between January 2006 - March 2011. Contraceptives, Postcoital pills, emergency contraception, levonorgestrel, data collection. original papers, letters to the editor in which stated aims were the description, prediction or measurement of variables related to EC use. Twenty-two papers were retrieved and fourteen were finally selected, all of which were descriptive. manuscripts were evaluated by two independent reviewers. Women requesting EC have ages between 21-24 years, mostly single and university students; declare that they have not previously used EC, and attend an Emergency department, at weekends and within 48 hours following unprotected sexual intercourse. The reason is condom rupture. None of the studies reviewed measured alcohol and other drug consumption, the number of sexual partners, nor any of the studies performed a comparison with a group not using EC. lack of homogeneity and comprehensiveness of studied variables resulted in a limited profile of Spanish EC users. Further studies are needed with a more comprehensive approach if sexual health interventions are to be carried out in possible users.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 63 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 13%
Student > Master 7 11%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Other 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 29 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 19 30%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 29 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2016.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem
#445
of 842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#240,054
of 369,846 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem
#16
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 842 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,846 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.