↓ Skip to main content

Prevention of sexually transmitted diseases among visually impaired people: educational text validation1

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prevention of sexually transmitted diseases among visually impaired people: educational text validation1
Published in
Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, August 2016
DOI 10.1590/1518-8345.0906.2775
Pubmed ID
Authors

Giselly Oseni Barbosa Oliveira, Luana Duarte Wanderley Cavalcante, Lorita Marlena Freitag Pagliuca, Paulo César de Almeida, Cristiana Brasil de Almeida Rebouças

Abstract

to validate an educational text in the context of Sexually Transmitted Diseases (STD) for visually impaired persons, making it accessible to this population. a validation study, in a virtual environment. Data collection occurred from May to September 2012 by emailing the subjects, and was composed by seven content experts about STDs. Analysis was based on the considerations of the experts about Objectives, Structure and Presentation, and Relevance. on the Objectives and Structure and Presentation blocks, 77 (84.6%) and 48 (85.7%) were fully adequate or appropriate, respectively. In the Relevance block, items 3.2 - Allows transfer and generalization of learning, and 3.5 - Portrays aspects needed to clarify the family, showed bad agreement indices of 0.42 and 0.57, respectively. The analysis was followed by reformulating the text according to the relevant suggestions. the text was validated regarding the content of sexually transmitted diseases. A total of 35 stanzas were removed and nine others included, following the recommendations of the experts. validar texto educativo no contexto das doenças sexualmente transmissíveis para pessoas com deficiência visual para torná-lo acessível a essa população. estudo de validação, em ambiente virtual. Coleta de dados de maio a setembro de 2012, por meio da utilização dos e-mails eletrônicos dos sujeitos, compostos por sete especialistas em conteúdo na temática, através de instrumento próprio. Análise ocorreu com base nas considerações dos especialistas sobre os Objetivos, Estrutura e Apresentação e Relevância. nos blocos de Objetivos e Estrutura e Apresentação, 77 (84,6%) e 48 (85,7%) eram totalmente adequados ou adequados, respectivamente. No bloco de Relevância, os itens 3.2 - Permite transferência e generalização da aprendizagem, e 3.5 - Mostra aspectos necessários para informar a família, revelaram índices de concordância ruins de 0,42 e 0,57, respectivamente. Após a análise, o texto foi reformulado de acordo com as sugestões relevantes. o texto foi validado com relação ao conteúdo das Doenças Sexualmente Transmissíveis. Ao total, 35 estrofes foram removidos e outros nove incluídos, seguindo as recomendações dos especialistas. educativo en el contexto de las enfermedades de trasmisión sexual para personas con deficiencia visual para hacerlo accesible a esa población. un estudio de validación en ambiente virtual. Recolecta de datos de mayo a septiembre de 2012 mediante la utilización de los correos electrónicos de los sujetos, compuestos por siete especialistas en contenido en el tema, a través de instrumento propio. El análisis fue basado en las consideraciones de los especialistas sobre los Objetivos, Estructura y Presentación y Relevancia. en los bloques de Objetivos y Estructura y Presentación, 77 (84,6%) y 48 (85,7%) eran totalmente adecuados o adecuados, respectivamente. En el bloque de Relevancia, los ítems 3.2 - Permite transferencia y generalización del aprendizaje, y 3.5 - Muestra aspectos necesarios para informar la familia, revelaron índices de concordancia malos de 0,42 y 0,57, respectivamente. Después del análisis, el texto fue reformulado de acuerdo con las sugestiones relevantes. el texto fue validado respecto al contenido de las enfermedades de trasmisión sexual. Al total, 35 estrofas fueron removidas y otros nueve incluidas, siguiendo las recomendaciones de los especialistas.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 18%
Student > Master 4 12%
Other 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 15 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 10 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 9%
Linguistics 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 15 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2016.
All research outputs
#14,278,325
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem
#254
of 842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#181,894
of 354,571 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem
#13
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 842 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,571 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.