↓ Skip to main content

Computer and laboratory simulation in the teaching of neonatal nursing: innovation and impact on learning1

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
197 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Computer and laboratory simulation in the teaching of neonatal nursing: innovation and impact on learning1
Published in
Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, October 2016
DOI 10.1590/1518-8345.1005.2808
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luciana Mara Monti Fonseca, Natália Del' Angelo Aredes, Ananda Maria Fernandes, Luís Manuel da Cunha Batalha, Jorge Manuel Amado Apóstolo, José Carlos Amado Martins, Manuel Alves Rodrigues

Abstract

to evaluate the cognitive learning of nursing students in neonatal clinical evaluation from a blended course with the use of computer and laboratory simulation; to compare the cognitive learning of students in a control and experimental group testing the laboratory simulation; and to assess the extracurricular blended course offered on the clinical assessment of preterm infants, according to the students. a quasi-experimental study with 14 Portuguese students, containing pretest, midterm test and post-test. The technologies offered in the course were serious game e-Baby, instructional software of semiology and semiotechnique, and laboratory simulation. Data collection tools developed for this study were used for the course evaluation and characterization of the students. Nonparametric statistics were used: Mann-Whitney and Wilcoxon. the use of validated digital technologies and laboratory simulation demonstrated a statistically significant difference (p = 0.001) in the learning of the participants. The course was evaluated as very satisfactory for them. The laboratory simulation alone did not represent a significant difference in the learning. the cognitive learning of participants increased significantly. The use of technology can be partly responsible for the course success, showing it to be an important teaching tool for innovation and motivation of learning in healthcare. avaliar a aprendizagem cognitiva de estudantes de enfermagem na avaliação clínica neonatal a partir de um curso semipresencial com uso de simulação por computador e em laboratório; comparar a aprendizagem cognitiva dos estudantes em grupo controle e experimental ao testar a simulação em laboratório; e avaliar o curso semipresencial extracurricular oferecido sobre avaliação clínica do bebê pré-termo, segundo os estudantes. estudo quase-experimental com 14 estudantes portugueses contendo pré-teste, teste intermediário e pós-teste. As tecnologias oferecidas no curso foram serious game e-Baby, software instrucional de semiologia e semiotécnica e simulação em laboratório. Para a avaliação do curso e caracterização dos estudantes utilizou-se instrumentos de coleta de dados desenvolvidos para este estudo. Utilizou-se estatística não paramétrica: Mann-Whitney e Wilcoxon. O uso de tecnologias digitais validadas e de simulação em laboratório evidenciou diferença estatisticamente significativa (p=0,001) na aprendizagem dos participantes. O curso foi avaliado como muito satisfatório pelos mesmos. A simulação em laboratório isoladamente não representou diferença significativa no aprendizado. a aprendizagem cognitiva dos participantes aumentou significativamente. Considera-se que o uso de tecnologia foi responsável por parte do sucesso do curso, denotando ser uma importante ferramenta de inovação didática e motivação da aprendizagem na área da saúde. evaluar el aprendizaje cognitivo de estudiantes de enfermería en evaluación clínica neonatal, a partir de un curso semipresencial, utilizando simulación por computador y en laboratorio; comparar el aprendizaje cognitivo de los estudiantes, entre grupo control y experimental, comprobando la simulación en el laboratorio; y evaluar el curso semipresencial extracurricular ofrecido sobre evaluación clínica del bebé pretérmino, de acuerdo a los estudiantes. estudio casi experimental con 14 estudiantes portugueses, conteniendo preprueba, prueba intermedia y postprueba. Las tecnologías ofrecidas en el curso fueron serious game e-Baby, programa de instrucción en semiología y semiotecnia, y simulación en laboratorio. Para la evaluación del curso y caracterización de los estudiantes se utilizaron instrumentos de recolección de datos desarrollados para este estudio. Se utilizó la estadística no-paramétrica de Mann-Whitney y Wilcoxon. el uso de tecnologías digitales validadas y de simulación en laboratorio evidenció diferencia estadísticamente significativa (p=0,001) en el aprendizaje de los participantes. El curso fue evaluado como muy satisfactorio por los alumnos. La simulación en laboratorio, aisladamente, no presentó diferencia significativa en el aprendizaje. el aprendizaje cognitivo de los participantes aumentó significativamente. Se considera que el uso de la tecnología fue responsable por parte del éxito del curso, demostrando ser una importante herramienta de innovación didáctica y motivación del aprendizaje en el área de la salud.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 197 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 197 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 34 17%
Student > Bachelor 25 13%
Professor 15 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 7%
Researcher 13 7%
Other 37 19%
Unknown 59 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 56 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 12%
Social Sciences 17 9%
Psychology 10 5%
Computer Science 7 4%
Other 19 10%
Unknown 64 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2018.
All research outputs
#16,721,208
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem
#419
of 842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#203,151
of 327,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem
#8
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 842 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,211 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.