↓ Skip to main content

Construction and validation of educational materials for the prevention of metabolic syndrome in adolescents1

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Construction and validation of educational materials for the prevention of metabolic syndrome in adolescents1
Published in
Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, October 2017
DOI 10.1590/1518-8345.2024.2934
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ionara Holanda de Moura, Antônia Fabiana Rodrigues da Silva, Aparecida do Espírito Santo de Holanda Rocha, Luisa Helena de Oliveira Lima, Thereza Maria Magalhães Moreira, Ana Roberta Vilarouca da Silva

Abstract

To develop and validate an educational technology focused on prevention of metabolic syndrome among adolescents. This was methodological research. Using an integrative review, the available publications on the subject were analyzed. Then, this knowledge was used to describe the theoretical content and, with the help of a graphic designer, the art and layout of the pages were developed. In the third phase, the booklet was evaluated and validated by 21 specialists and 39 adolescents. Data collection included three different questionnaires, according to the focus of evaluation of each group of participants, analyzed for reliability (Cronbach's Alpha) and agreement by Infraclass Correlation Coefficient. The mean score attributed by technical content experts was 91.7%, and the content validity index, measured by experts responses, was 0.98, showing high reliability and agreement. In addition, the level of agreement of the positive responses given by adolescents was 88.4%. the educational booklet has proved to be a valid and reliable tool to be used for promoting adolescent health.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 80 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 23 29%
Student > Master 6 8%
Researcher 5 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Student > Postgraduate 5 6%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 25 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 24 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 13%
Social Sciences 6 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 26 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2017.
All research outputs
#17,292,294
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem
#445
of 842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#211,501
of 330,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 842 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,919 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.