You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Breastfeeding self-efficacy and postpartum depression: a cohort study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, September 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1590/1518-8345.2110.3035 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Erika de Sá Vieira, Nathalia Torquato Caldeira, Daniella Soares Eugênio, Marina Moraes di Lucca, Isília Aparecida Silva |
| Abstract |
to evaluate breastfeeding self-efficacy, the presence of postpartum depression symptons and the association between breastfeeding self-efficacy and postpartum depression with cessation of exclusive breastfeeding. cohort study with 83 women. The instruments used were the Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale and the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Statistical analysis was conducted using the log-rank tests, analysis of variance and the Cox survival model. breastfeeding self-efficacy (p = 0.315) and postpartum depression (p = 0.0879) did not show any statistical difference over time. The chances of cessation of exclusive breastfeeding decreased by 48% when self-efficacy changed from low to medium and by 80% when it changed from medium to high. Postpartum women who scored ≥10 on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale interrupt exclusive breastfeeding, on average, 10 days earlier than those with a score ≤9, whose median breastfeeding duration was 38 days postpartum. breastfeeding self-efficacy was proved to be a protective factor for exclusive breastfeeding, while postpartum depression is a risk factor. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 392 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 392 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 44 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 30 | 8% |
| Researcher | 15 | 4% |
| Lecturer | 15 | 4% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 3% |
| Other | 46 | 12% |
| Unknown | 229 | 58% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 81 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 46 | 12% |
| Psychology | 10 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 1% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 1% |
| Other | 19 | 5% |
| Unknown | 226 | 58% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2023.
All research outputs
#7,359,319
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem
#128
of 842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,932
of 345,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem
#5
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 842 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,662 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.