↓ Skip to main content

Communication in health and inter-professional collaboration in the care for children with chronic conditions*

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Communication in health and inter-professional collaboration in the care for children with chronic conditions*
Published in
Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, January 2021
DOI 10.1590/1518-8345.4044.3390
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria Denise Schimith, Marta Regina Cezar-Vaz, Daiani Modernel Xavier, Letícia Silveira Cardoso

Abstract

to understand how health communication in the care of children with chronic conditions interferes with inter-professional collaboration. a multicentric qualitative research. Data collection, carried out through interviews and observation, occurred from October 2017 to February 2018. For data organization, the NVivo software, version 12, was used. These data were analyzed from a dialectical perspective. a total of 79 professionals were interviewed, including physicians and nurses in the Family Health Strategy. Essential markers for inter-professionality stand out, such as multi-institutional communication; the historical and political context of the municipalities; the bond between staff and families with children with chronic conditions; and active and purposeful communication. inter-professional collaboration is strengthened when the therapeutic plan of the child with a chronic condition is coordinated by the Family Health Strategy, plus the intention of communicating with the secondary sector. It is considered that the research included important issues, contributing to planning the work process in the Family Health Strategy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 3 8%
Librarian 1 3%
Professor 1 3%
Student > Master 1 3%
Researcher 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 28 78%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 3 8%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 27 75%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2021.
All research outputs
#15,181,325
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem
#300
of 842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#263,936
of 519,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem
#28
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 842 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 519,506 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.