You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The bats of Rio Grande do Norte state, northeastern Brazil
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biota Neotropica, April 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1590/1676-0611-bn-2017-0417 |
| Authors |
Juan Carlos Vargas-Mena, Kleytone Alves-Pereira, Marília Abero Sá Barros, Eder Barbier, Eugenia Cordero-Schmidt, Sergio Maia Queiroz Lima, Bernal Rodríguez-Herrera, Eduardo Martins Venticinque |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 61 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 11% |
| Researcher | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 13% |
| Unknown | 21 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 26% |
| Environmental Science | 14 | 23% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 22 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2018.
All research outputs
#19,951,180
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Biota Neotropica
#47
of 58 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#238,331
of 324,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biota Neotropica
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 58 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,262 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.