You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Development of a conceptual framework for the management of biodiversity and ecosystem services in the Mexican Caribbean
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biota Neotropica, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1590/1676-0611-bn-2019-0901 |
| Authors |
Andrés Sánchez-Quinto, Julliet Correa da Costa, Nadia S. Zamboni, Fábio H. C. Sanches, Silas C. Principe, Evangelina V. Viotto, Elvira Casagranda, Francisco A. da Veiga-Lima, Bianca Possamai, Larisse Faroni-Perez |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Brazil | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 71 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 13% |
| Researcher | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 6% |
| Professor | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 17% |
| Unknown | 20 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 18 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 18% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 13% |
| Unknown | 21 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2020.
All research outputs
#15,529,011
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Biota Neotropica
#26
of 58 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#252,782
of 473,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biota Neotropica
#7
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 58 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 473,401 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.