You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Fístula arteriovenosa como tratamento adjunto na revascularização arterial do membro em risco
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Jornal Vascular Brasileiro, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1590/1677-5449.210042 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Júlio César Gomes Giusti, Sabrina Payne Tartarotti, Fabio Henrique Rossi, João Paulo Neves Beraldo, Francisco Cardoso Brochado |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 33% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 33% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 33% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2022.
All research outputs
#7,361,749
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Jornal Vascular Brasileiro
#19
of 185 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#172,539
of 519,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Jornal Vascular Brasileiro
#7
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 185 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 519,506 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.