↓ Skip to main content

Oral infection by Pseudomonas aeruginosa in patient with chronic kidney disease - a case report

Overview of attention for article published in Jornal Brasileiro de Nefrologia, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Oral infection by Pseudomonas aeruginosa in patient with chronic kidney disease - a case report
Published in
Jornal Brasileiro de Nefrologia, April 2018
DOI 10.1590/1678-4685-jbn-3812
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luana Carneiro Diniz Souza, Fernanda Ferreira Lopes, Eider Guimarães Bastos, Cláudia Maria Coelho Alves

Abstract

Chronic renal patients are more susceptible to hospital complications and infections such as urinary tract infections, peritonitis, surgery infections, and bacteremia, which are often caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. A case of a HIV-positive girl with chronic kidney disease and with serious oral lesions due to P. aeruginosa septic shock is presented. The patient showed necrotic lesions in the oral mucosa, pathological tooth mobility, bone loss, and hematogenous osteomyelitis in the maxilla. The patient was submitted to systemic antibiotic therapy based on screening culture and treatment of bone lesions by eliminating the causal agent and restoring health conditions. This case report is extremely important for health professionals, since the oral cavity can be affected by this pathogen or serve as a colonization site.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 17%
Student > Master 6 13%
Researcher 3 6%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 19 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 21%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 6%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 20 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2018.
All research outputs
#17,292,294
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Jornal Brasileiro de Nefrologia
#167
of 365 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220,173
of 340,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Jornal Brasileiro de Nefrologia
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 365 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,931 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.