↓ Skip to main content

Dealing with iron metabolism in rice: from breeding for stress tolerance to biofortification

Overview of attention for article published in Genetics and Molecular Biology, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dealing with iron metabolism in rice: from breeding for stress tolerance to biofortification
Published in
Genetics and Molecular Biology, March 2017
DOI 10.1590/1678-4685-gmb-2016-0036
Pubmed ID
Authors

Railson Schreinert dos Santos, Artur Teixeira de Araujo, Camila Pegoraro, Antonio Costa de Oliveira

Abstract

Iron is a well-known metal. Used by humankind since ancient times in many different ways, this element is present in all living organisms, where, unfortunately, it represents a two-way problem. Being an essential block in the composition of different proteins and metabolic pathways, iron is a vital component for animals and plants. That is why iron deficiency has a severe impact on the lives of different organisms, including humans, becoming a major concern, especially in developing countries where access to adequate nutrition is still difficult. On the other hand, this metal is also capable of causing damage when present in excess, becoming toxic to cells and affecting the whole organism. Because of its importance, iron absorption, transport and storage mechanisms have been extensively investigated in order to design alternatives that may solve this problem. As the understanding of the strategies that plants use to control iron homeostasis is an important step in the generation of improved plants that meet both human agricultural and nutritional needs, here we discuss some of the most important points about this topic.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 114 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 18%
Researcher 18 16%
Student > Master 13 11%
Student > Bachelor 12 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 8%
Other 15 13%
Unknown 28 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 48 41%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 3%
Engineering 3 3%
Chemistry 3 3%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 32 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2017.
All research outputs
#19,951,180
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Genetics and Molecular Biology
#526
of 772 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#235,067
of 322,508 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetics and Molecular Biology
#12
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 772 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,508 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.