↓ Skip to main content

D-loop haplotype diversity in Brazilian horse breeds

Overview of attention for article published in Genetics and Molecular Biology, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
D-loop haplotype diversity in Brazilian horse breeds
Published in
Genetics and Molecular Biology, August 2017
DOI 10.1590/1678-4685-gmb-2016-0166
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patrícia Ianella, Maria do Socorro Maués Albuquerque, Samuel Rezende Paiva, Andréa Alves do Egito, Leonardo Daniel Almeida, Fabiana T P S Sereno, Luiz Felipe Ramos Carvalho, Arthur da Silva Mariante, Concepta Margaret McManus

Abstract

The first horses were brought to Brazil by the colonizers after 1534. Over the centuries, these animals evolved and adapted to local environmental conditions usually unsuitable for exotic breeds, thereby originating locally adapted Brazilian breeds. The present work represents the first description of maternal genetic diversity in these horse breeds based on D-loop sequences. A D-Loop HSV-I fragment of 252 bp, from 141 horses belonging to ten Brazilian breeds / genetic groups (locally adapted and specialized breeds) were analysed. Thirty-five different haplotypes belonging to 18 haplogroups were identified with 33 polymorphic sites. Haplotype diversity (varying from 0.20 to 0.96) and nucleotide diversity (varying from 0.0039 to 0.0239) was lower for locally adapted than for specialized breeds, with the same pattern observed for FST values. Haplogroups identified in Brazilian breeds are in agreement with previous findings in South American samples. The low variability observed mainly in locally adapted breeds, indicates that, to ensure conservation of these breeds, careful reproductive management is needed. Additional genetic characterization studies are required to support accurate decision-making.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 10%
Professor 3 10%
Researcher 3 10%
Other 8 28%
Unknown 4 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 24%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 5 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 14%
Linguistics 2 7%
Chemistry 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 7 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2018.
All research outputs
#7,780,614
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Genetics and Molecular Biology
#127
of 772 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,467
of 323,945 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetics and Molecular Biology
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 772 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,945 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.