↓ Skip to main content

De novo transcriptome assembly of the lobster cockroach Nauphoeta cinerea (Blaberidae)

Overview of attention for article published in Genetics and Molecular Biology, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
De novo transcriptome assembly of the lobster cockroach Nauphoeta cinerea (Blaberidae)
Published in
Genetics and Molecular Biology, July 2018
DOI 10.1590/1678-4685-gmb-2017-0264
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ana Lúcia Anversa Segatto, José Francisco Diesel, Elgion Lucio Silva Loreto, João Batista Teixeira da Rocha

Abstract

The use of Drosophila as a scientific model is well established, but the use of cockroaches as experimental organisms has been increasing, mainly in toxicology research. Nauphoeta cinerea is one of the species that has been studied, and among its advantages is its easy laboratory maintenance. However, a limited amount of genetic data about N. cinerea is available, impeding gene identification and expression analyses, genetic manipulation, and a deeper understanding of its functional biology. Here we describe the N. cinerea fat body and head transcriptome, in order to provide a database of genetic sequences to better understand the metabolic role of these tissues, and describe detoxification and stress response genes. After removing low-quality sequences, we obtained 62,121 transcripts, of which more than 50% had a length of 604 pb. The assembled sequences were annotated according to their genes ontology (GO). We identified 367 genes related to stress and detoxification; among these, the more frequent were p450 genes. The results presented here are the first large-scale sequencing of N. cinerea and will facilitate the genetic understanding of the species' biochemistry processes in future works.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 17%
Researcher 2 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Lecturer 1 6%
Professor 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 8 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Environmental Science 1 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 8 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2018.
All research outputs
#15,745,807
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Genetics and Molecular Biology
#331
of 772 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#190,383
of 339,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetics and Molecular Biology
#5
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 772 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,622 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.