↓ Skip to main content

Tailed bacteriophages (Caudoviricetes) dominate the microbiome of a diseased stingless bee

Overview of attention for article published in Genetics and Molecular Biology, January 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tailed bacteriophages (Caudoviricetes) dominate the microbiome of a diseased stingless bee
Published in
Genetics and Molecular Biology, January 2023
DOI 10.1590/1678-4685-gmb-2023-0120
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lilian Caesar, Karen Luisa Haag

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2024.
All research outputs
#7,696,117
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Genetics and Molecular Biology
#126
of 772 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,014
of 475,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetics and Molecular Biology
#2
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 772 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 475,313 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.