You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS IN BRAZIL: LITERATURE REVIEW AND RESEARCH AGENDA1
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Revista de Administração Mackenzie, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1590/1678-6971/eramd200066 |
| Authors |
TOBIAS C. PARENTE, CLÁUDIO A. P. MACHADO |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 38 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
| Professor | 3 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 18 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 11 | 29% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 11% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 8% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 19 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2021.
All research outputs
#6,602,824
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Revista de Administração Mackenzie
#45
of 92 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,052
of 473,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista de Administração Mackenzie
#8
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 92 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 473,401 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.