↓ Skip to main content

Assessment of the accuracy of portable monitors for halitosis evaluation in subjects without malodor complaint. Are they reliable for clinical practice?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Applied Oral Science, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assessment of the accuracy of portable monitors for halitosis evaluation in subjects without malodor complaint. Are they reliable for clinical practice?
Published in
Journal of Applied Oral Science, January 2017
DOI 10.1590/1678-7757-2016-0305
Pubmed ID
Authors

Denise Pinheiro Falcão, Priscila Carvalho Miranda, Tayana Filgueira Galdino Almeida, Monique Gomes da Silva Scalco, Felipe Fregni, Rivadávio Fernandes Batista de Amorim

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 22%
Researcher 4 11%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Professor 2 6%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 14 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 44%
Neuroscience 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Engineering 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 15 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2024.
All research outputs
#22,764,772
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Oral Science
#496
of 596 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#362,560
of 421,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Oral Science
#21
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 596 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,709 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.