You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparison of two combinations of opioid and non-opioid analgesics for acute periradicular abscess: a randomized clinical trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Applied Oral Science, January 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1590/1678-7757-2016-0407 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Manuela Favarin Santini, Ricardo Abreu da Rosa, Maria Beatriz Cardoso Ferreira, Maria Isabel Fischer, Erick Miranda Souza, Marcus Vinícius Reis Só |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 116 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 14% |
| Unknown | 49 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 34% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Psychology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 10% |
| Unknown | 50 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2021.
All research outputs
#7,359,319
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Oral Science
#74
of 596 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,117
of 421,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Oral Science
#6
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 596 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,709 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.