You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Factors affecting the periapical healing process of endodontically treated teeth
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Applied Oral Science, January 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1590/1678-7757-2016-0464 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Roberto Holland, João Eduardo Gomes, Luciano Tavares Angelo Cintra, Índia Olinta de Azevedo Queiroz, Carlos Estrela |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 357 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 357 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 46 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 37 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 36 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 6% |
| Other | 15 | 4% |
| Other | 57 | 16% |
| Unknown | 143 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 179 | 50% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 1% |
| Engineering | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 17 | 5% |
| Unknown | 140 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2020.
All research outputs
#17,292,294
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Oral Science
#216
of 596 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#267,895
of 421,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Oral Science
#14
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 596 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,709 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.