You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Botulinum toxin type A and acupuncture for masticatory myofascial pain: a randomized clinical trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Applied Oral Science, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1590/1678-7757-2020-1035 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Giancarlo DE LA Torre Canales, Mariana Barbosa Câmara-Souza, Rodrigo Lorenzi Poluha, Cassia Maria Grillo, Paulo César Rodrigues Conti, Maria da Luz Rosário de Sousa, Renata Cunha Matheus Rodrigues Garcia, Célia Marisa Rizzatti-Barbosa |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Philippines | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 109 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 12% |
| Researcher | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 5% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 12% |
| Unknown | 60 | 55% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 5% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 65 | 60% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2021.
All research outputs
#21,075,298
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Oral Science
#310
of 605 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#403,782
of 529,431 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Oral Science
#15
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 605 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 529,431 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.