You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mechanical testing of thin-walled zirconia abutments
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Applied Oral Science, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1590/1678-7757201302124 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Luigi CANULLO, Paulo G. COELHO, Estevam A. BONFANTE |
| Abstract |
Although the use of zirconia abutments for implant-supported restorations has gained momentum with the increasing demand for esthetics, little informed design rationale has been developed to characterize their fatigue behavior under different clinical scenarios. However, to prevent the zirconia from fracturing, the use of a titanium connection in bi-component aesthetic abutments has been suggested. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 76 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 19% |
| Researcher | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 11 | 14% |
| Unknown | 17 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 46 | 57% |
| Engineering | 5 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Materials Science | 3 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 20 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2013.
All research outputs
#20,238,711
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Oral Science
#274
of 602 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#223,957
of 293,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Oral Science
#8
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 602 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 293,068 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.