↓ Skip to main content

Effect of prosthodontic planning on lateral occlusion scheme: a comparison between conventional and digital planning

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Applied Oral Science, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of prosthodontic planning on lateral occlusion scheme: a comparison between conventional and digital planning
Published in
Journal of Applied Oral Science, January 2015
DOI 10.1590/1678-775720140491
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jaafar Abduo, Mohammed Bennamoun, Marc Tennant, John McGeachie

Abstract

Recently, digital wax-up is proposed as a tool to aid prosthodontic planning. However, there are no data about the effect of prosthodontic planning on lateral occlusion scheme. This study aims to evaluate the impact of conventional and digital prosthodontic planning on lateral occlusion scheme. Dental models of 10 patients were collected. All models had Angle Class I occlusion and were undergoing prosthodontic treatment that would influence the lateral occlusion scheme. Each set of models had received both conventional wax-up and digital wax-up. In relation to the lateral occlusion scheme, the following variables were evaluated: the prevalence of the different lateral occlusion scheme, number of contacting teeth and percentage of each contacting tooth. Four excursive positions on the working side were included: 0.5, 1.0, 2.0 and 3.0 mm from the maximal intercuspation position. The lateral occlusion scheme of the two wax-up models was subjected to alterations following excursion. There was a tendency for the prevalence of canine-guided occlusion to increase and for the prevalence of group function occlusion to decrease with increasing excursion. The number of contacting teeth was decreasing with the increasing magnitude of excursion. For the 0.5 mm and 1.0 mm positions, the two wax-ups had significantly greater contacts than the pre-treatment models, while at the 2.0 mm and 3.0 mm positions, all the models were similar. For all models, canines were the most commonly contacting teeth, followed by the teeth adjacent to them. No difference was observed between the two wax-ups in relation to the number of contacting teeth. Although the prosthodontic planning had influenced the pattern of the lateral occlusion scheme and contacts, there was no difference between the conventional and digital prosthodontic planning.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 18%
Student > Master 6 14%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Lecturer 2 5%
Other 10 23%
Unknown 11 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 36%
Business, Management and Accounting 8 18%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Unspecified 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 12 27%